Childish Nonsense

Exploring Children's Literature

Banned Books Week

on October 3, 2012

This week, the American Library Association marks the 30th anniversary of Banned Books Week. I was going to say “celebrates,” but it’s too sad to call a celebration.

Beyond the ethical considerations of telling people what they can or cannot read, just think of what would have been lost (and why) if book banning were easy. Slaughterhouse Five by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. was banned by Island Trees, New York School Board in 1976 for being “just plain filthy.” It is widely regarded as Vonnegut’s most influential work and beloved by millions. I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou, her powerful and revealing autobiography was cited as “deviant” by the Alabama Textbook Committee. Maurice Sendak’s In the Night Kitchen, winner of the Caldecott Medal was removed from a Beloit, Wisconsin elementary school in 1985 for displaying nudity. Bridge to Terabithia by Katherine Paterson, a Newbery Medal winner and darn good book, was cited in Lincoln, Nebraska for use of profanity because one character uses “Oh, Lord!” as an expletive. Judy Blume’s Forever… was banned for “profanity, sexual situations, and themes that allegedly encourage disrespectful behavior.” Judy Blume, an author credited with tackling numerous difficult issues and helping kids with those issues, is also one of the most challenged authors in history. Leading the crowd on tackling bullying, The Chocolate War by Robert Cormier was challenged in West Hernando, Florida for being “inappropriate.” In 1995, To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee was challenged in two school districts because it dealt with racial themes. Phyllis Reynolds Naylor’s Alice series, another help for many children dealing with large issues, was cited as “inappropriate.” Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger, still in publication after sixty years, has been called a “filthy, filthy book.” The Harry Potter series, which has encouraged literally millions to read was challenged for “witchcraft and sorcery.” Lois Lowry’s dystopian opus, The Giver, another Newbery Medal winner, was called “lewd” and “twisted.” Maybe they need to look up “dystopian.” arry HAnd the list goes on and on.

I admit there are gray areas with book banning. If a book is abusive and/or invasive to a living person, it may not warrant protection. (Think: your right to make a fist ends where my nose begins.) Along the same lines, a volume that is obviously inflammatory in a politically-charged atmosphere is at least irresponsible. Obvious pornography should not be available to children.

But, in general, the dangers of censorship outweigh the benefits. I, for one, can’t imagine the world without any of these books. Might as well ban learning. I’m sure there are those who would endorse this idea.

One response to “Banned Books Week

  1. jennpower says:

    Reblogged this on It's all kids stuff. and commented:
    More reasons for why children’s books are banned. Also makes a good point about books being banned which are abusive to people… She also says to ban books is to ban learning.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: